Garland doesn’t say if he sought ethics guidance regarding ties to son-in-law’s CRT-promoting company
Attorney General Merrick Garland refused to say Thursday whether he sought ethics guidance concerning his son-in-law’s business – which pushes critical race theory-related ideas and provides services to school districts nationwide – before he issued his explosive memo this month saying the FBI will investigate threats by parents against school board members.
While testifying at a House Judiciary Committee hearing dedicated to the oversight of the Justice Department, Garland was asked by Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., to address conflict of interest concerns regarding his son-in-law’s company, Panorama Education, a technology company that endorses the type of left-leaning ideas that parents have opposed in school districts across the U.S.
COMPANY OWNED BY GARLAND’S SON-IN-LAW RECEIVED AT LEAST $27 MILLION FROM SCHOOL SYSTEMS: REPORT
The company was reportedly paid at least $27 million from as many as 1,500 school districts…